Compare solutions
Which model fits you?
The three models differ on one question above all: who holds the licence. Everything else follows from that.
| White Label | Turnkey | API & Aggregation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gaming licence | Ours | Yours | Not applicable |
| Time to launch | 2–4 weeks | 1–3 months | Days |
| Brand ownership | Yours, under our licence | Fully yours | Not applicable |
| Player data ownership | Held on platform, fully accessible | Fully yours | Yours |
| Customisation | Themes plus your branding | Structural and bespoke | Not applicable |
| Platform included | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Game content | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Payment stack | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Back office & agents | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Infrastructure & security | ✓ | ✓ | Provider side only |
| Dedicated environment | Shared | Dedicated | Not applicable |
| Multi-brand | One brand per agreement | ✓ | ✓ |
| Upfront cost | None | Setup fee | None |
| Ongoing cost | Revenue share | Monthly or revenue share | Revenue share |
| Best for | Entering the market without a licence | Established operators wanting full control | Platforms that need content only |
Scroll the table sideways to compare all three.
Decision guide
Start here
Three questions usually settle it.
-
QUESTION 01
Do you already have a platform?
If yes, you need API & Aggregation. Stop here.
-
QUESTION 02
Do you hold a gaming licence, or will you within three months?
If yes, Turnkey gives you full ownership. If no, White Label lets you launch now.
-
QUESTION 03
How much does structural customisation matter?
If your product needs to look and behave differently from anything on the market, that's Turnkey. If speed matters more, that's White Label.
Still unsure?
Describe your situation on a call. We'll tell you which model we'd recommend, including when the answer is "none of ours yet".